Some of Gore’s scare tactics are revealed…
Some of Gore’s scare tactics are revealed…
One of the claims of the Global Warming establishment is that jellyfish population will skyrocket. Of course, that is nonsense.
Who is that swimming on the surface? Tipper? Nah, too skinny.
Is this how people who question the dogma of climate change are going to be treated? If so, I might as well just close up shop. From The Telegraph (UK) via Drudge.
Scientists who questioned mankind’s impact on climate change have received death threats and claim to have been shunned by the scientific community.
They say the debate on global warming has been “hijacked” by a powerful alliance of politicians, scientists and environmentalists who have stifled all questioning about the true environmental impact of carbon dioxide emissions.
Timothy Ball, a former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg in Canada, has received five deaths threats by email since raising concerns about the degree to which man was affecting climate change.
Further down in the article is a telling tidbit:
”Scientists who dissent from the alarmism have seen their funds disappear, their work derided, and themselves labelled as industry stooges.
“Consequently, lies about climate change gain credence even when they fly in the face of the science.”
Dr Myles Allen, from Oxford University, agreed. He said: “The Green movement has hijacked the issue of climate change. It is ludicrous to suggest the only way to deal with the problem is to start micro managing everyone, which is what environmentalists seem to want to do.”
Nigel Calder, a former editor of New Scientist, said: “Governments are trying to achieve unanimity by stifling any scientist who disagrees. Einstein could not have got funding under the present system.“
Appalling.
The basics of anthropogenic climate change skepticism. Some good stuff, here.
Reminiscent of those funny Jib-Jab fellers. Maybe it is them. Who cares? This here is comedy gold.
More golf!! “Global Comfortabling!”
Sarah Silverman!
Even though she’s probably wrong about her basic assumptions, it’s still a funny parody.
The audience shots of the people who thought she was serious are priceless. Well, maybe some of them are in SHOCK that someone would even kid about such a (cough) important topic.
Recent Comments